Feds 4 Med Freedom Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 874126760
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Reno, NV, USA
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $345,155
- Expenses
- $335,055
- Assets
- $144,018
- Liabilities
- $47,802
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Marcus Thornton (President)
- Kevin McAfee (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Marcus Thornton (President)
- James E Erdman (Treasurer)
- Kevin McAfee (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is a nonprofit corporation that shall be organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes and other programs and projects as described in 170(c)(2)(B), 501(c)(3), 2055(a)(2), and 2522(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or corresponding provisions of any subsequent federal tax laws. The organization principally exists to (a) assist federal employees who faced job insecurity, including threat of termination of employment and discrimination due to COVID-19 vaccine mandates; (b) support federal employees who seek to improve accountability, transparency, and uphold constitutional rights within the federal service by building a supportive coalition; (c) provide transparency to the American public through Freedom of Information Act requests and through the podcast; (d) solicit and receive funds for the accomplishment of the above purposes; and (e) pursue any other lawful purpose permitted to be pursued by a charity (or, by a private foundation
What it reported doing in 2024
Litigation - The organization has organized and provided legal assistance with more than 16 class action lawsuits pending at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or in Federal Court. We successfully litigated our initial lawsuit Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden up to the United States Supreme Court. Due to this lawsuit, we received an injunction that was in effect for two years and we were able to protect the careers of an estimated 400,000 federal employees up through and past the rescission of the Executive Order that created the mandates. We have also partnered with other non-profit organizations to support legal action against federal labor unions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $99.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -25.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -53.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.8% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $317K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.