Fed Is Best Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813316541
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Little Rock, AR, USA
- Phone
- 5012913697
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Biological & Life Sciences
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $48,407
- Expenses
- $49,158
- Assets
- $1,524
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- CHRISTIE DEL CASTILLO-HEGYI MD (SCIENCE DIRECTO)
- JODY SEGRAVE-DALY RN IBCLC (INFANT FEEDING)
- BETH DEL CASTILLO (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's purpose is to educate parents and health professionals about the dangers of accidental starvation from insufficient feeding of infants, particularly if exclusive breastfeeding when breastfeeding is not enough. We examine the science of infant feeding and brain injury caused by starvation related complications of exclusive breastfeeding by critically reviewing stories of breastfeeding complications sent to us by parents and health professionals and studying the scientific medical literature. We develop guidelines and provide education to prevent these tragedies.
What it reported doing in 2024
In the year 2024, the Fed is best foundation continued its work to support parents and health professionals to feed newborns and infants safely and sufficiently. Our social media platform on Facebook has reached over 900,000 followers and includes the parent infant feeding support group, which provides direct one-on-one and group support for individual parents who have concerns about infant feeding. It is moderated by a panel of license lactation consultants, nurses and doctors that provide evidence based safe feeding advice. The goal of the group is to provide judgment-free, safe, evidence-based feeding advice to parents who are breastfeeding, combination feeding, formula feeding, pump breast milk feeding, and tube feeding in a way that prioritizes feeding infants so that they thrive. We also address maternal mental health issues related to modern pressures to feed infants in a particular way, especially when they are unable to achieve their feeding goals. We also support health professionals in a private health professional support group. This includes nurses, lactation professionals, and doctors who share concerns about the hospital quality metric that enforces avoidance of formula supplementation in breastfed infants, which has led to infants becoming excessively jaundiced, dehydrated, and hypoglycemic resulting in preventable hospitalizations and even long-term brain developmental problems and deaths. These professionals are commonly grappling with the ethical dilemma of being encouraged to tell parents that they're crying newborns are not hungry to avoid formula supplementation according to the hospital metric, when in fact they are and are at risk of developing starvation-related complications that can result in readmission, extended hospital admission, and long-term neurodevelopmental disability. We study the published scientific literature to understand what constitutes safe thresholds in the clinical management of infants as it relates to weight loss, bilirubin, glucose, and sodium levels. We also study what levels of jaundice, hypoglycemia and hypernatremia can result in long term developmental disabilities to help guide safer infant feeding policies. We also discuss ways we can support parents in a non-judgmental way in order to help them reach their infant feeding goals while ensuring the safe and humane feeding of their infants. We have also signed a book contract with Ben Bella, a publisher that distributes through Penguin House Publishing for our book, Fed is Best: Feeding Your Baby Through Breast, Bottle or Both, Which is expected to be released August of 2024. In this book we provide a comprehensive review of the history of breastfeeding and bottle feeding, the science of infant feeding, as well as a complete guide to breastfeeding, supplementing, combination feeding, formula and bottle feeding. We provide recommendations on how to closely monitor newborn breastfeeding initiation to prevent the serious complications of jaundice, dehydration, hypernatremia, and hyperglycemia and how to ensure healthy growth through the first year of life. We continue to draw media attention to the issue of safe and inclusive infant feeding support for all families. We have seen this influence extend into the professional realm as breast is best versus fed is best was discussed in the Pediatric Academic Societies 2022 conference where significant attention was paid to the safety issues of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.5%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 53.6%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -18.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.5% of revenue deployed · 53.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.