Feaster Family Foundation Inc %Joseph D Feaster Jr

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932309780
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Stoughton, MA, USA
Phone
7814081425
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,637
Expenses
$7,210
Assets
$14,808
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEPH D FEASTER JR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSEPH D FEASTER JR (DIRECTOR)
  • PHYLLIS D ELLISON-FEASTER (DIRECTOR)
  • AALANA R FEASTER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To increase public awareness of mental health issues in society. To support innovative programming, organizations and institutions through charitable giving, with particular consideration to mental health initiatives and support for mental health, suicide prevention, and support those affected by suicide.

What it reported doing in 2025

Outreach accomplishments: to design, develop and maintain a website to bring awareness and support to the community by offering access to information. To create a networking environment with local educational institutions and organizations to help support research.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 61% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 32%; rating input score 32
  • Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.3%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.05; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 109.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 116.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 126.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 32% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.