Fc Green Bay Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550871687
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Green Bay, WI, USA
Phone
9207373600
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Soccer

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$159,195
Expenses
$191,757
Assets
$248,804
Liabilities
$83,660

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WYTSE MOLENAAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SUSAN MOLENAAR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WYTSE MOLENAAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SUSAN MOLENAAR (PRESIDENT)
  • ERICH QUIDZINSKI (INTERIM VP)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide soccer training and competition opportunities for youth.

What it reported doing in 2020

Provide youth an opportunity to train under skilled coaches and play at a highly competitive level of soccer.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -20.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $180K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.