FBI National Academy Associates of NE
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042883147
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Dover, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6173548831
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $58,692
- Expenses
- $78,230
- Assets
- $169,690
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kristen Kelly (President)
People named in this filing
- Peter A McGowan (Treasurer and Clerk)
- Kristen Kelly (President)
- Thomas Griffin (VP and Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote training programs in various duly constituted law enforecement agencies within our country, giving to the members thereof the benefit of our training received at the FBI National Academy. To perpetuate the memory of our Association with the members of our class, associates, and faculty, and to encourage attendance at all training sessions. To encourage and assist in the enlightenment and education of the general public. To cooperate with all duly constituted law enforcement agencies and officers, and the general public, in all matters of mutual interest, and particularly, the exchange and dissemination of ideas and information; the detection and prevention of crime and the apprehension of criminals; to strive for the highest degree of respect for law and order and the maintenance thereof; and to promote and keep alive the comradeship between the FBI National Academy Associates within the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachussetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
What it reported doing in 2022
Provide training programs in various duly constituted law enforcement agencies within our country.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 72%; rating input score 72
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -33.3%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.17; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96% of revenue deployed · 72% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.