Fbi Cleveland Citizens Academy Alumni Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201977299
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Cleveland, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2163012710
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Law Enforcement
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $90,173
- Expenses
- $88,207
- Assets
- $214,540
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAYMOND MARVAR (PRESIDENT)
- KIM HAMMOND (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MONICA GHOSE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RAYMOND MARVAR (PRESIDENT)
- KIM HAMMOND (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MONICA GHOSE (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The fbi cleveland citizens academy alumni association was formed in december, 2004 and is a nonprofit public service organization with the goal of promoting safer communities in the greater cleveland metropolitan area. The members believe this can be accomplished by improving understanding and encouraging appreciation of law enforcement among the citizenry and community leaders.
What it reported doing in 2025
Flags for honor: the 2025 flags for honor program took place in edgewater park over patriot day weekend. Participants honored their heroes, mentors, or loved ones by dedicating an american flag in their honor. Honorees included: covid-19 first responders, law enforcement officers, firefighters, active or reserve u.s. Military personnel, u.s. Military veterans, mentors, teachers and coaches, healthcare providers, social workers, volunteers and many other heroes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 69% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 27
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.2%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 23.9%; rating input score 24
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.43; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29.2% of revenue deployed · 23.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.