Fayette Resources
Legal name: Fayette Resources Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251660280
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Uniontown, PA, United States
- Phone
- (724) 437-6461 (Uniontown Corp. Office)
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,459,590
- Expenses
- $61,816,655
- Assets
- $43,574,063
- Liabilities
- $6,581,166
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSEPH FERENCAK (PRESIDENT/CHAIRPERSON)
- KATHY SUSANO MORRIS (CEO/CO-CHAIRPERSON)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHY SUSANO MORRIS (CEO/CO-CHAIRPERSON): $236,056 total reported compensation
- JACQUE FOX (CHIEF FISCAL OFFICER): $180,750 total reported compensation
- JIM PEARL (HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR): $171,960 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission at Fayette Resources is to empower individuals with disabilities by providing high-quality, individualized services that promote independence, informed decision-making, choice, growth, acceptance, and respect within their communities. In 2015, Fayette Resources became the first residential program in the United States to obtain the National Association of Dual Diagnosis (NADD) certification. Since then, Fayette Resources has continued to provide quality services with a focus on the unique needs of the individual. At Fayette Resources, our administrative employees and direct support professionals are driven by our mission statement and are committed to constantly developing and adapting individualized programs that empower the individuals we support. Fayette Resources’ services are provided in a variety of community settings to best meet the needs and goals of each...
What it reported doing in 2024
Clearfield jefferson county mh/mr program -to provide opportunities for growth, learning, and development for individuals who are developmentally disabled.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.4%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 81.4% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $54.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $236K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.