Fayette Regional Health System
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251451183
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-T 2020
- Location
- Uniontown, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7244305222
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,417,104
- Expenses
- $5,521,653
- Assets
- $13,509,727
- Liabilities
- $4,071,845
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christa Ebbert (Executive Director, Clinical Operations/CCo)
- Mark Dillon (Executive Director, Nursing)
- Patricia Herman (Executive Director, Support Services)
- Beth Carolla (Executive Director, Quality Experiences)
- Charles Bondarenka (Executive Director, Nursing Services/CNO)
Highest reported compensation
- Barbara Weiss (Treasurer/CFO): $322,684 total reported compensation
- Christa Ebbert (Executive Director, Clinical Operations/CCo): $304,897 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Systems vision is to make a healthy difference in the lives we touch. We will fulfill our vision by providing excellent customer service, promoting teamwork, maintaining competency, assuring productivity ensuring compliance, all the while, being mindful of our financial regulatory responsibilities.
What it reported doing in 2020
Operating cost of finance and management personnel to provide the coordination of the financial and operational activities of its subsidiary, the Uniontown Hospital, and advancement of healthcare in the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.1%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 59.3%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.45; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.1% of revenue deployed · 59.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $436K · 16 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $498K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.