Fayette County Technical Rescue Team Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271640618
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Rossville, TN, USA
Phone
9014966800
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Search and Rescue Squads

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,076
Expenses
$26,415
Assets
$25,017
Liabilities
$17,861

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KEVIN SNIDER (CHAIRMAN)
  • MATT WILSON (SECRETARY)
  • LINDSEY WILSON (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide technical rescue capabilities to the citizens of our response area at no cost to the taxpayers. Assist local emergency responders in discharge of their duties.

What it reported doing in 2023

Vehicle extrication classes certifying/recertifying local emergency responders; external training programs for our members; internal operational readiness exercises for our team members continuous training such as dive unit training, farm and industrial machinery rescue training, cpe, etc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -54.7%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.71; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.1% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.