Fatherhood the Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 934208931
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Bellingham, WA, USA
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Civil Rights, Social Action, Advocacy N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,100
- Expenses
- $69,915
- Assets
- $7,206
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Fatherhood the Foundation (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Fatherhood the Foundation (Executive Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fatherhood the Foundation transforms fathers by equipping them to intentionally and proactively re-engage themselves in their childrens lives effectively. At Fatherhood the Foundation our mission is to empower fathers and father figures by providing them with the necessary tools and support to intentionally and proactively re-engage in their childrens lives. We recognize the crucial role that fathers play in the development and well-being of their children and we aim to transform their understanding and approach to fatherhood. We provide mentorship community support access and education to resources community engagement learning who we are and where we come from culturally relevant celebrations mock interview support clothing loans for interviews access to food and light tolietries.
What it reported doing in 2024
We strive to equip fathers with the skills knowledge and emotional support they need to establish meaningful connections with their children. We believe that by actively engaging in their childrens lives fathers can positively influence their overall development fostering stronger family units and healthier communities. We have hosted learning sessions family face to face interaction with meals games and round table discussions. We have had listening sessions hosted lectures and community resources providing meals light refreshments bus passes and in some instances we have bailed out our clients and provided short term motel stays. By breaking down barriers that hinder father-child relationships whether they are due to personal circumstances societal pressures or systemic challenges. By promoting active responsible and loving fatherhood we work towards creating a future where children thrive families are strengthened and communities flourish. We have hosted Fathers Days where dads can afford to take their kids out and have needs like coats and school supplies and family outings at parks with themed sports and games and interactive fun with each other. We host difficult mediation job skills support links to community resources and host in our building wrap around support for our most traumatized clients so that they can be in one space while outreach is done here and the services come to them.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.2%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 61.4%; rating input score 61
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.2% of revenue deployed · 61.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.