Father's Daymother's Day Council Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
131601569
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Long Island City, NY, USA
Phone
9172730369
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,238,618
Expenses
$2,190,403
Assets
$2,924,463
Liabilities
$1,625,458

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • G MATTHEW YOUNGS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAEL CONNELL HASKELL (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • NANCE HASTINGS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • G MATTHEW YOUNGS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $166,904 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The father's day/mother's day council, inc. (the "council") is a not-for-profit organization that raises funds from our annual events to help meaningful philanthropies dealing with issues affecting mothers, fathers, and children.the council recognizes and celebrates outstanding fathers and mothers who have demonstrated exemplary commitment to their families, communities, and careers.

What it reported doing in 2024

We contributed $750,000 to no kid hungry, a national campaign dedicated to ending childhood hunger in america.no kid hungry works to ensure that every child has access to the nutritious food they need to grow, learn, and thrive.millions of children across the united states face food insecurity, often depending on school meals as their primary source of nutrition. When school is out, weekends, evenings, and summers can become periods of hunger, affecting children's health, academic performance, and long-term well-being.no kid hungry missionto end childhood hunger in america by ensuring all children get the healthy food they need, every day. No kid hungry addresses the root causes of hunger by expanding access to effective nutrition programs, supporting schools and community organizations, and advocating for policies that strengthen the food safety net. Their work focuses on increasing participation in school breakfast and lunch programs, summer meals, afterschool nutrition, and emergency food access.accomplishments-helped connect millions of children to free and healthy meals each year -played a key role in increasing school breakfast participation nationwide -supported community-based organizations, food banks, and schools with funding, training, and resources -advocated for bipartisan policy solutions that have measurably reduced childhood hunger rates over the past decade through strategic partnerships and proven, scalable solutions, no kid hungry has helped significantly reduce childhood hunger in the u.s., ensuring children are better prepared to succeed in school and beyond.our program served our charitable partner big brothers big sisters of america. In 2025, we contributed $525k to big brothers big sisters of america.since 1904, big brothers big sisters has operated under the belief that inherent in every child is incredible potential. As the nation's largest donor- and volunteer-supported mentoring network, big brothers big sisters makes meaningful, monitored matches between adult volunteers ("bigs") and children ("littles"), ages 5 through young adulthood in communities across the country. We develop positive relationships that have a direct and lasting effect on the lives of young people.we gave $150k to boys hope girls hope of New York.bhghny gives adolescent children an opportunity for education and career readiness.boys hope girls hope missionto nurture and guide motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others. Some children just don't have the same opportunities as others. They face all kinds of barriers that limit their potential. At the same time, they have inspiring grit, motivation, capacity, and promise; needing access to education and skills that will give them a chance to thrive in life and make a difference in their communities.that's where we come in. Boys hope girls hope closes the achievement gap and workforce development divide by acting as a bridge to opportunity which spans middle school through college graduation and into career launch.we contributed $25,000 to snack (special needs activity center for kids), a nonprofit organization dedicated to enriching the lives of children with special needs through inclusive, engaging, and supportive programming.snack provides a safe and nurturing environment where children of all abilities can learn, grow, and build meaningful social connections.children with special needs often face barriers to participation in traditional recreational and enrichment activities. These challenges can limit opportunities for social interaction, skill development, and confidence-building - while families frequently struggle to find programs that truly understand and support their children.snack missionto create a welcoming community that empowers children with special needs by providing inclusive activities that promote socialization, independence, and joy.snack offers structured recreational, educational, and therapeutic activities

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 93
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 68.5%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99%; rating input score 99; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 44.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69% of revenue deployed · 68.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 23 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $167K · 23 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $102K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.