Fashion Galaxy Alliance Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461369441
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Pelham, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9147385143
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,733
- Expenses
- $5,733
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jing Tian (Chairman & President)
- Claudia Alvarez (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jing Tian (Chairman & President)
- Claudia Alvarez (Vice President)
- Yihan Wang (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promoting creative and emerging fashion desigers across borders; Enhancing cultural, education, and fashion exchange between North America and Asia; Supoorting fashion and talents show events; Promoting environmentally friendly fabrics; and Developing charities for disadvantaged women and children in fashion industry.
What it reported doing in 2025
We have sponsored and donated funds for the Cultural Performance and Fashion & Education seminars at BISU North America Alumni Association Anniversary Events on June 16th, 2025 at Columbia/Pen Club located at 30 West 44th Street, New York, NY 10036. Before the Event, we helped Parsons Fashion Design graduate to design BISU-NAAA logo and limited edition polo shirts, T-Shirts a d Tennis Hats. In addition, we also sponsored fashion experts speaking on styling at the education seminar on and after the Anniversary Event.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 39% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -17.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.