Fasb Fitness Festival Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841599051
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Greenwood Village, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3036946464
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fairs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $28,202
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- KRISTINA DAVIDSON (CHAIRMAN)
- CHARLES MCNEIL (DIRECTOR)
- JENNIFER CHURCHFIELD (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote nutrition awareness, health, physical and mental fitness for cherry creek school district area youth through a fundraising festival resulting in a cash donation to community asset project, inc., a 501(c)(3) entity.
What it reported doing in 2014
Through 2013, annual net proceeds from fitness festival fundraising are donated to community asset project, inc. (cap), which is organized to support cherry creek school district area's youth participating in activities that promote nutrition, health, physical and mental fitness in general. Fasb donated its remaining funds to cap in 2014 and dissolved 3/13/15.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -66.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -42.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -40.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.