Farthest Corners Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870768571
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Nokesville, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7037547933
- Rating
- 96
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $130,910
- Expenses
- $127,746
- Assets
- $100,898
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- DANIEL HOUSE (CHAIRMAN)
- ERIC BECKMAN (DIRECTOR)
- CYNTHIA B HENSON (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To express god's love in remote regions of asia where persecution and suffering exists by providing humanitarian aid for the great spiritual, physical and educational needs of the people. Currently, the foundation provides humanitarian aid as well as spiritual and educational assistance to the displaced people of burma.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide medical kits and supplies - cooking utensils, blankets, toiletries, clothing, hymnals, bibles and mosquito nets - for displaced people inside burma and along its border. In addition, providing support of happy's home, a hostel/orphanage within burma.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.6%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.6% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $125K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.