Farrell Treatment Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 060883267
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019
- Location
- New Britain, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8602254641
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $593,022
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL E OSBORNE (CEO - GILEAD)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIEL E OSBORNE (CEO - GILEAD): $162,259 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The rehabilitation and re-socialization of drug dependent individuals.
What it reported doing in 2019
To provide care and treatment for alcohol and drug dependent persons on either a 24 hour basis at the facility or on an outpatient basis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 3
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $593K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $162K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.