Farmington Valley Mudhogs Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205547365
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Farmington, CT, USA
Phone
8607169628
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Football

Reported finances

Revenue
$124,657
Expenses
$129,629
Assets
$67,930

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NICOLE MORIN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NICOLE MORIN (PRESIDENT)
  • MATTHEW BUB (VICE PRESIDE)
  • DAWN RYZAK (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is that the mudhog nation welcomes and provides the framework to sponsor volunteers that coach, assist, and support the youth football, flag, and cheer programs. We continuously improve this framework so that we refresh our commitment to make a positive impact on the children that represent the future of our community.

What it reported doing in 2024

To prepare youth football players and cheerleaders in the valley for the fundamentals of our sport. Preparing them to safely continue to the four high school programs that we serve. Annually, we offer summer football clinics for both tackle and flag players as well as our cheer program. We work closely with the town of farmington and farmington high school to ensure the highest quality clinics for our young athletes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.