Farmington Boys Lacrosse Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472338147
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Farmington, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6122982763
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $53,206
- Expenses
- $44,556
- Assets
- $65,656
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kelly Harris (President)
- Mika Kieffer (Past President)
People named in this filing
- Kelly Harris (President)
- Kim Sondergard (Secretary)
- Jennifer Mackie (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The FHS Boys Lacrosse Booster Club exists to promote youth lacrosse at the high school level and to support the FHS Boys Lacrosse program's approximately 70 student-athletes and their coaches. Our mission is to contribute to the creation of championship-caliber lacrosse for our student athletes and to serve as a source of pride for our community. We help to encourage team sportsmanship, pride, and unity within the program; cultivate physical fitness, school spirit, academic excellence, leadership, community service and individual character for the members of the program; provide a means of communication between the coaching staff, parents; and school officials; and to develop, lead, and manage programs that will financially benefit the Farmington High School Boys Lacrosse program.
What it reported doing in 2024
Special events including an end of year banquet to honor the players and coaches and celebrate their accomplishments
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.1%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.3%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.47; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.1% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.