FARMacyWV
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881092753
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Wheeling, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3042816917
- Rating
- 29
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $266,718
- Expenses
- $266,718
- Assets
- $150,666
- Liabilities
- $150,666
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Amanda Cummins (Vice President)
- Carol Antonelli-Greco (President/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Amanda Cummins (Vice President): $12,000 total reported compensation
- Audrey Tellez (Secretary/Treasurer): $8,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of FARMyacy WV is to support patients with chronic disease, especially type 2 Diabetes by providing fresh locally grown produce as well as culinary and nutrition education for both treatment and prevention
What it reported doing in 2025
Provision of fresh produce for multiple FQHCs, hospitals, and private physician practices for 15 weeks at $25/patient /week purchased from local farmers, growers and aggregators. The produce distribution was set up in a farmers market style which allowed the participants to select their own produce and interact with the farmers supplying the produce as well as health facility staff present at the pick up. An educational class (nutrition and culinary skills) was provided directly after the produce pickup for 45 minutes weekly for the first 9 weeks of the program. Laboratory data, HgA1c and lipid profiles were collected pre and post program as well as surveys meant to elicit how the patient progressed over the course of the program. Such information such as food insecurities in the home, knowledge of produce consumption, preparation, and changes in eating habits were elicited via these surveys. An estimated 530 patients were served via this program in 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -65.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -110.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $236K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $12K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 15 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.