Fargo Moorhead Human Resources Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
450410007
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Fargo, ND, USA
Phone
7013650556
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$118,083
Expenses
$127,497
Assets
$132,875
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KRISS BURNS (PRESIDENT)
  • SABRINA OLSEN (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN CRONEN (PRESIDENT-ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • KRISS BURNS (PRESIDENT)
  • KARA ANDERSON (FINANCE DIRECTOR)
  • SABRINA OLSEN (PAST PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to support human resources professionals by providing quality programs, networking resources, and career development opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Monthly educational luncheons focused on current hr issues the majority of which provide recertification credit to certified professionals with an average attendance of 150 professionals (similar to prior year). Each month we partner with other area organizations to promote continuing education events and conferences. We provide a quarterly newsletter focused on chapter resources and current hr issues. We offer a library of books, videos, and reference materials to our members. We offer web based resources. We provide leadership opportunities. We provide a student program with 20 college student members (consistent with prior year).

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.