Family to Family Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760328275
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7134666304
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,558
- Expenses
- $48,550
- Assets
- $9,951
- Liabilities
- $3,506
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mary Jane Williams (Executive Director)
- Bryan Smith (Board President)
People named in this filing
- Mary Jane Williams (Executive Director)
- Bryan Smith (Board President)
- Jennifer Salcich (Board Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Create success for children with disabilities by empowering their families with information, training, referrals and support as they navigate the complex education, health care and social service systems.
What it reported doing in 2025
Information, training, referrals and support - F2FN was provided case management to 60 individuals through the end of August 2025 and provided 3 training events to fulfill the responsibilities of our final grant. In addition, we updated 160 resources and provided 20 new resources to complete the end of our contract with Texas Parent to Parent for the Navigate Life Texas website. Family to Family Network ceased operations on Sept 30, 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.9%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 16.8%; rating input score 17
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -286.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.9% of revenue deployed · 16.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.