Family Supportive Housing Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770106237
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Phone
4089268885
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,890,827
Expenses
$4,284,631
Assets
$12,025,862
Liabilities
$208,965

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BETH LEARY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • BETH LEARY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $247,335 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Family supportive housing, inc. Is committed to the entire family and encourages families to stay intact while addressing their needs for food, shelter, education, and employment. The organization provides shelter, housing opportunities for those at risk of losing their housing, and educational support. The organization provides an opportunity for families to make life altering changes, and a system to aid in finding permanent housing.

What it reported doing in 2024

Shelter programwith nearly forty years of experience working with families in need, the organization has developed a set of services that empower families to move from homelessness to independent, self-sufficient lives in the community. The organization's san jose family shelter is the only shelter in santa clara county that exclusively serves homeless families. It operates 35 efficiency apartments 365 days per year. Despite the challenges and uncertainty, this year fsh has been able to serve 600 clients, with 43,435 shelter nights, and 134,685 nutritious meals. The organization wrap around services included 50,000 hours of case management meetings in support of employment, housing, health and wellness. Fsh facilitated 596 health care visits in partnership with gardner family health network and bay area community health. The organization presented 188 life skills workshops on education, finances, job development, technology skills, health and wellness, and self-care. Eighty-three percent of the organization's shelter families successfully transitioned into permanent housing and self-sufficiency. The organization has continued to identify creative solutions and engage with its partner agencies to develop opportunities to help families in their care.homework enrichment program: provides daily, supervised academic assistance, skill development and enrichment activities to 96 children in grades k-12 each year.early childhood education: provides reliable, quality, onsite childcare for infants and preschool children in the evening, at the organization's san jose family shelter. By providing a safe and loving environment for their young children, the organization allows parents to concentrate their time and energy on seeking employment and permanent housing.heading home program: in collaboration with destination home and santa clara county, this program provides resources to families, including short-term hotel stays, while families search for more long-term options. This year, 25 families were provided nightly sleeping accomodations, meal services, and other basic needs. Fsh case managers provided support to the families in line with their housing goals and collaborated closelywith other community organizations to ensure a seamless response.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.4%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.1%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.81; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.4% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $247K · 9 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.