Family Support Network of Senc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581868436
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Wilmington, NC, USA
Phone
9107926133
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$88,008
Expenses
$85,854
Assets
$24,363
Liabilities
$2,305

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • CHRISTINA M IVINS (EXECUTIVE DI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We provide familiies of children with special needs emotional and educational support, assistance in accessing community services, and promote family centered practices in the southeastern region on North Carolina.

What it reported doing in 2024

Coastal bringing up down syndrome (buds) this is contract with coastal buds, another nonprofit organization, in which the taxpayer provide support and fiscal management, and staffing for their programs. These programs support the down syndrome community in southeastern nc and included running support groups, community activities and outreach. Exceptional childrens assistance center (ecac) this is a contract to distribute information and provide outreach in the rural counties that the taxpayer serves for the programs that ecac has developed. It is a collaborative project that brings services through virtual means to the rural southeastern region of nc to support families of children with special healthcare needs or disabilities and include workshops on idea and iep procedures in rural nc. State appropriations this funding helps the taxpayer to pay ancillary items such as insurance and accounting expenses, travel to statewide meetings, and suppliments the ncdss funds. Brunswick local interagency coordinatin council (licc) the taxpayer is the treasurer for the brunswick county licc and as such the taxpayer houses the funding and distributes it to fund outreach projects in brunswick county exclusively. Intensive reunification project (irp) this is a contract directly with new hanover county department of social services and the taxpayer to provide intensive supports and parenting training and coaching to families of very young children who are at risk of disability or have a disability and are at risk of or have been recently removed from parental custody. The parents are ordered to get parenting classes in order to reunify the families quickly in order to reduce the risk of developmental delay and increase parental confidence and competence and reunify the families. Families are court ordered and come from dss. This project includes case managers from nhc dss intensive reunification project, and 1 triple p credentialed staff from the taxpayer.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.6%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 37.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.6% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $85K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.