Family Support Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330248195
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Orange, CA, USA
Phone
7144473301
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,049,069
Expenses
$1,066,870
Assets
$821,401
Liabilities
$280,574

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MAURA BYRON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MAURA BYRON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $90,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provides services offering resources and advocacy for families/children with social, emotional, intellectual and physical needs so they may reach their full potential.

What it reported doing in 2024

Parent-to-parent outreach - when a patient-caregiver is affected by a child with special needs (medical, intellectual, developmental and/or behavioral), they are partnered through the parent-to-parent outreach program with a parent mentor, who as parents of children with special needs can offer one-on-one support, general suggestions, and information immediately. Total families served was 6, the total number of resources given was 24.voice options - distributed 75 units to qualified individuals.emergency needs program - the emergency needs program provides basic needs items, such as diapers, food, clothing, baby formula, and cribs to families who have children with special needs or children "at-risk". Last year we served 61 families and provided 133 resources/referrals related to emergency needs.bloom - free behavior management program for families with children ages 0-5 who are experiencing behavioral issues due to times of transition, sudden or unexpected changes in routine (for example covid), or existing diagnosis. Bloom served 307 families and provided 1,164 resources. Families received a total of 1,228 individual sessions (max 5 each family).developmental screening program - free, comprehensive screening for children ages 0-5. Screened 430 children for developmental milestones. Follow-up and assistance provided to those receiving a referral for additional services, 918 services provided.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 91.4%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $46.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93% of revenue deployed · 91.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $975K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.