Family Services of Westchester

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
131773419
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Purchase, NY, US
Phone
9149372320
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,796,542
Expenses
$38,609,443
Assets
$21,584,094
Liabilities
$16,422,111

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDSAY FARRELL (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • KAREN FINK (VP OF CLINICAL SERVICES): $173,975 total reported compensation
  • JOQUENE HALL RAMIREZ (SVP EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRA): $140,772 total reported compensation
  • NNACHI MBA (PSYCHIATRIC NURSE PRACTITI): $125,950 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Family Services of Westchester provides a broad range of mental health and social services that strengthen and support community members.

What it reported doing in 2024

"fsw's education programs are comprised of early head start, head start, head start, prime time and universal pre-kindergarten.early head start is a federal program which serves pregnant women, infants and toddlers using either a home-based or a center-based delivery model. Early head start is designed to support parents in their roles as the primary influences on the education and development of their children.head start is a federally funded program for preschoolers from low-income families, intended to foster young children's development and well-being. Head start is designed to support parents in their roles as the primary influences on the education and development of their children. Within head start, four-year-olds can be enrolled in the universal pre-kindergarten program, a collaboration between fsw and the white plains city school district.prime time is a special education program that offers diagnostic, remedial, and preventive services to preschool children with developmental and/or learning disabilities. A variety of classroom models provide the least restrictive environment for each child based on his or her individual education plan. Services include speech, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and psychological and educational services and evaluations by licensed professionals. Bilingual evaluations are also offered.universal pre-kindergarten (upk) is a New York state department of education program funded to serve four-year-old preschoolers residing in the city of white plains who are entitled to attend the white plains city school district when they are of kindergarten age. Universalpre-kindergarten is a comprehensive early childhood program for children and their families that fosters the development and well-being of children.senior services fsw's homecare program provides services from our livable communities connections, gatekeeper and elder abuse prevention programs. Veteran's services this service area includes our vet2vet peer support & suicide prevention program. We have expanded our services to veterans and families from all areas without restrictions to service dates, discharge or dependency status we address problems that arise during military service, community reintegration, and offer individualized strategies to address the unique issues faced by the military/veteran community and their family our peer support program is backed by our case management program, aimed to address the most essential of human needs, housing, food stability, employment, benefits, and peer support our staff is comprised of former active duty combat veterans and veteran family members we served over 500 veterans during the fiscal year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 61% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.1%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $224.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.76; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 21 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 93.1% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $34.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $174K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $792K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.