Family Service of San Leandro
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943268842
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- San Leandro, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5104836715
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $530,099
- Expenses
- $667,245
- Assets
- $457,744
- Liabilities
- $50,196
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Angela Apple (President)
- Pamela Davis (President)
- Lisa Perry (Former Executive Director)
- Kelly O'Lague Dulka (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Lisa Perry (Former Executive Director): $27,623 total reported compensation
- Angela Apple (President): $24,150 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide professional counseling services to families with personal difficulties. Provide services to ensure improved family functioning through individual and family therapy.
What it reported doing in 2018
Provided professional counseling services to families with personal difficulties. Provided services to ensure improved family functioning through individual and family therapy.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.7%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 54.6%; rating input score 55
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.7% of revenue deployed · 54.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $364K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $28K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.