Family Roots for Life Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
854235589
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Richmond, TX, USA
Phone
8328007989
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$111,774
Expenses
$71,035
Assets
$72,378
Liabilities
$1,114

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Atasha M Kelley-Harris (President)
  • Yolonda R Kelley (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Atasha M Kelley-Harris (President)
  • Yolonda R Kelley (Vice President)
  • Katina Scott (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We reunite, reconnect, and restore children, youth, and families through the provision of social, emotional, and behavioral health services to ensure child and family well-being.

What it reported doing in 2025

Family Roots for Life, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to reuniting, reconnecting, and restoring children, youth, and families through the provision of social, emotional, and behavioral health services. Their programs focus on supporting transition-age youth and young adults impacted by foster care and/or juvenile justice systems, at-risk youth and young adults within the larger community, and individuals across the lifespan for family finding and support services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.8%; rating input score 31
  • Program expense ratio: 48.4%; rating input score 48

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.6%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -62.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 43.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 81.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.8% of revenue deployed · 48.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.