Family Promise of Southern Chester County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352518819
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Kennett Square, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6104440400
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $548,244
- Expenses
- $581,966
- Assets
- $652,877
- Liabilities
- $13,252
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TOM SAUSEN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROL LOWE MSW LSW (EXECUTIVE DI): $97,316 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Family promise of southern chester county (fpscc) was created to address the growing problem of homelessness in families with children in the communities defined by the four southern chester county school districts: kennett, avon grove, oxford, and unionville-chadds ford.
What it reported doing in 2024
Fpscc provides housing, wholesome food, and basic necessities for families with children experiencing homelessness. The goal of the organization is to move families to self-sufficiency, providing them with services including but not limited to employment assistance, education in budgeting and parenting, as well as family/individual counseling. Once families are in a financial position to move into an apartment, help is provided to find and furnish the new home with everything needed from furniture to dishware to linens. Fpscc stays in touch with our families, supplying holiday gifts, school supplies, and other life necessities. The work of family promise includes three main components, which we employ separately or together depending upon each familys needs: diversion (promise made): aims to prevent families from entering shelter by providing immediate financial assistance and support services to resolve housing crises and maintain stable housing. Promise house: offers shelter and case management services for families experiencing homelessness for up to 120 days in an apartment- like setting, focusing on providing a safe and supportive environment while helping them transition to stable housing. This program offers the regions only emergency shelter for families. At this time, we are able to offer promise house locations to up to eight families at a time, a service for which we always have a waiting list. Stabilization (promise kept): provides ongoing support to families up to one year after securing housing to ensure long-term stability and prevent future crises and incidences of homelessness. Homelessness is a very stressful and traumatic experience. We are proud to have increased capacity for shelter assistance from two promise houses in 2022 to six promise houses in 2024. We served 102 families across all programs and provided 1,279 nights of shelter to families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, and 46% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 83.7%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.2%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.2% of revenue deployed · 83.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $487K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.