Family Promise of Fulton County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452803656
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Roswell, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7706095407
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Emergency Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $475,665
- Expenses
- $471,943
- Assets
- $160,772
- Liabilities
- $4,312
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- COYE MANN (PAST PRESIDENT)
- SAM KLEIN (PRESIDENT)
- JURON DOBBS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANDREA BRANTLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDREA BRANTLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $87,736 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Family promise of north fulton/dekalb's mission is to engage community and faith based organizations in ending homelessness one family at a time. We provide temporary assistance, hospitality and case management for families with children experiencing homelessness.
What it reported doing in 2024
2024 family promise accomplishmentsthe three-pronged strategy of prevention, emergency response, and rotational shelter is demonstrating our commitment to not only addressing immediate needs but also fostering long-term stability for families.our prevention program prevented 96 families from homelessness, prevention before it starts, especially for families with children is crucial. The emergency response assisted 2,233 families through a volunteer-driven hotline. Having real people available for support and navigation is a key element to bringing our community together. Our rotational shelter engages congregations of all faiths and volunteers with no overhead to the families and we served 14 families in 2024. Our families then have a seamless transition to the stabilization program. For families who graduate is a vital component in ensuring they maintain stability.most recently we embarked on a transitional house project with st. David's episcopal church. We spent 2024 raising the funds to remodel the home for 2 families at a time. These families will be paying rent on a sliding scale. We look forward to serving our first families in mid-2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.9%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $30.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.6%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.9% of revenue deployed · 83.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $395K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.