Family Promise of Essex County
Legal name: Family Promise of Essex County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222841105
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Montclair, NJ, US
- Phone
- 973-746-1400
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Shelters
- Affiliation
- Interfaith
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,671,868
- Expenses
- $1,837,098
- Assets
- $1,539,694
- Liabilities
- $544,496
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DALE RUSSAKOFF (PRESIDENT)
- LAMONT SWITTENBERG (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DOROTHEA AERY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DOROTHEA AERY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $102,953 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To help families find a home as quickly as possible while providing the services they need to become stable enough to secure and maintain it.
What it reported doing in 2025
Housing and stabilization servicesin 2025, fpe's housing programs collectively engaged 514 individuals, including 131 children; because some individuals moved between more than one fpe housing program during the year (e.g., from a rental assistance program into a housing supports program), this figure includes duplicated counts across housing sub-programs and is not an unduplicated count. An additional 255 individuals, including 99 children, participated in stabilization services.fpe walked alongside individuals and families as they transitioned into permanent housing, building the skills and connections needed for lasting independence. Housing activities included: 1) financial aid in the form of security deposits, utility deposits, rental assistance, and move-in assistance; and 2) pre-tenancy case management to assist constituents with housing search, completing applications and lease agreements, and understanding tenant rights and responsibilities. In addition, fpe partnered with the New Jersey department of community affairs and other essex county service providers to administer a nj tenant-based rental assistance (tbra) voucher program. Specifically, fpe case managers provided outreach, program education, and voucher application assistance for 300 sheltered and unsheltered individuals in the city of newark. Those 300 individuals are included in the total of 514 above.once housed, fpe case managers helped families maintain housing stability through budgeting, financial literacy, credit repair, workforce development, and job readiness training, including job search and interviewing skills and workplace protocol seminars. Fpe also provided seminars on landlord/tenant relationships and apartment maintenance, and assistance with childcare and transportation. Stabilization services also included tax preparation services, school supplies, holiday celebrations, summer camp opportunities, and other educational and community-building field trips, as well as parenting, wellness, and nutrition support.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 93.8% of revenue deployed · 85.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $103K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.