Family Promise of Bergen County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222853599
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Ridgewood, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2018338009
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,939,402
- Expenses
- $2,042,047
- Assets
- $3,136,298
- Liabilities
- $47,027
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATE DUGGAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- PAUL SHACKFORD (PRESIDENT)
- NADINE Z GENET (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KATE DUGGAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $142,820 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide temporary shelter and support to working families experiencing homelessness, and a dinner program to address food insecurity in the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
New leaf/new life transitional housing program: homelessness is a complex situation with many causes and underlying issues. After a thorough screening and assessment period in the bridge program, client families who show particular motivation and need additional time to address their personal, financial, and employment goals have the opportunity to live in one of the apartments that family promise rents and manages. Family case managers offer guidance and support to families as they assume these independent living situations. Families may remain in an apartment for up to two years as long as they are working toward their goals. Families in this program are able to avail themselves of all of the services family promise offers including:- job training and educational advancement in order to qualify for better paying jobs- childcare and transportation assistance removes common barriers to successful employment- financial education improves money management skills. With the help of professional financial coaches, families are given the tools they need to address their particular financial challenges.- participation in a mandatory savings plan to create an emergency fund to be able to face unexpected challenges once they leave the program- personal empowerment workshops help families increase their knowledge and gain confidence. When families become empowered, they begin operating from a standpoint of optimism and self-determination as they advance toward their goals. Interview and soft skills training, communication and assertiveness, positive parenting, and relaxation techniques are examples of topics that are explored.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, and 58% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.3%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 73.9%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.3% of revenue deployed · 73.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $143K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.