Family Life Ministries International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251841731
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
York, PA, USA
Phone
7178527369
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$75,727
Expenses
$65,685
Assets
$416,536
Liabilities
$205,443

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REV WENDELL BURDEN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • REV WENDELL BURDEN (PRESIDENT)
  • REV JUANITA BURDEN (VICE PRES.)
  • TUESDAY HAYES-MULLEN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the organization is to strengthen marital and family relationships and to build their faith in god.

What it reported doing in 2019

Provide counseling to couples to strengthen marriages and family relationships. Provide an annual marriage enrichment retreat to strengthen and encourage couples in their relationship with god and each other. Provide various workshops to promote marriage and family issues.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.2%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.34; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.2% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.