Family House Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251519959
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4125788650
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,125,142
- Expenses
- $6,070,863
- Assets
- $43,183,892
- Liabilities
- $16,660,110
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN PLANTE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN PLANTE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $179,480 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER BELL (SENIOR DIRECTOR OF DEVELOP): $154,582 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Family house, inc. Was founded and operates to provide affordable, overnight, temporary housing for patients and their families while they seek medical care. Family house, inc. Also provides temporary housing for visiting physicians, nurses, and medical students involved in the provision of medical care and services in the greater community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Organizational overviewsince 1983, family house has provided an affordable and comfortable "home away from home" for patients and their caregivers who travel to pittsburgh for medical treatment within any of the region's world-class healthcare systems - allegheny health network, the va pittsburgh healthcare system, or university of pittsburgh medical center. The 121-room facility allows family house to provide safe and affordable accommodations to over 19,000 people for over 35,000 room nights. Guests who stayed at family house during fy25 were from 50 states plus Washington dc and 19 different countries; 52% were Pennsylvania residents.programs:-family house's charitable care commitment helps to ensure that room rates charged to guests are approximately 75% of the total cost incurred by the organization to operate them. In addition to its deeply discounted rates, family house also offers: -family assistance funding. Recognizing that sudden and traumatic medical diagnosis can devastate a family's financial resources, family house provides further rate reductions for those guests based on financial need and length of stay. Family assistance may also be extended to provide support for transportation, clothing, as well as other immediate needs.-healthy breakfast program. Seven days per week, family house provides a complimentary healthy breakfast for all guests.-food pantry. Family house kitchen includes a pantry stocked with a wide assortment of food items available 24/7. This amenity is frequently used when guests arrive late at night, when stores and restaurants are closed, so they don't have to wait until the following morning to eat. This resource is also used by guests with food insecurities who cannot afford a meal out.-volunteer meal program. Each year, hundreds of volunteers come to family house to prepare meals and serve to our guests. From college students to retirees, corporations, to faith-based groups, family house annually welcomes volunteer groups every week who provide guests to a complimentary hot meal. -and more. Family house also hosts visits by therapy dogs as well as by musicians, such as pianists and acoustic guitarists. And family house partners with carnegie museums of pittsburgh, the pittsburgh zoo & ppg aquarium, phipps conservatory, the children's museum, and other cultural and entertainment venues to provide complimentary admission passes for its guests.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.11; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.39; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.8% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $179K · 26 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.