Family Foundation Intl

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841310935
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Littleton, CO, USA
Phone
3037971139
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$917,613
Expenses
$754,283
Assets
$1,336,883
Liabilities
$382,974

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CRAIG HILL (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • CRAIG HILL (PRESIDENT): $57,689 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To impart biblical wisdom and establish a culture of blessing among families, couples and individuals around the world

What it reported doing in 2023

Over the past year we conducted our global ministry teams conducted approximately 2500 bible based seminars and conferences in over 55 nations around the world, helping families and individuals improve or restore their marriages, relationships with children and generational patterns. In addition, we conducted weekly online teaching and prayer conferences by zoom reaching several thousand people each week. We initiated the ministry of ffi in nepal, initially trained a ministry team there and translated the ancient paths book and blessing generations seminar into the nepali language. We also conducted two 8-day international schools of ministry in gunnison, Colorado and st. Petersburg, fl training over 65 new ministry team members. In addition our teams conducted multiple similar international schools of ministry in brazil, colombia, austria and south africa. We also continued our weekly online church service every saturday for about 175 families with over 5000 views per week of the replay. This online church service also served to introduce the ministry of ffi to many new people in several different nations around the world.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 44
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.6%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $450.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 42.8%; rating input score 43; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.8%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.77; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.6% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $623K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 32 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 43/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.