Family Crisis Shelter and Services for Yamhill County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930786506
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mcminnvile, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5034720244
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Violence Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,205,708
- Expenses
- $1,014,641
- Assets
- $1,670,993
- Liabilities
- $66,249
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- NANCY PEREZ-FLORES (EXECUTIVE DI): $96,683 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Family crisis shelter and services for yamhill county, inc. (doing business as henderson house) serves primarily yamhill county, Oregon, providing shelter, information and referral services, counseling and education for persons in crisis. It also creates public awareness in the community regarding the problems surrounding domestic violence, sexual assault, and child abuse. Our mission is: "providing culturally aware outreach, education and services for victims of domestic and sexual violence through leadership, hope and respect for thriving families."
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, henderson house provided 951 nights of emergency shelter to survivors of domestic and sexual violence and their children. Our team of advocates responded to 1,702 calls through our 24/7 crisis support line and provided 2,412 in-person advocacy services, including safety planning, court accompaniment, and emotional support. Throughout the year, advocates developed 656 individualized safety plans and conducted 61 community education presentations aimed at prevention and awareness of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and human/sex trafficking. Henderson house offers a comprehensive range of trauma-informed services, including: -24/7 confidential crisis response -emergency shelter for individuals and families -assistance with protection orders and legal advocacy -housing support and resource referrals -facilitated support groups -prevention and outreach education throughout yamhill county all services are 100% confidential and provided free of charge, regardless of income or immigration status. Our work is guided by the mission of henderson house: "to provide culturally aware outreach, education, and services for victims of domestic and sexual violence through leadership, hope, and respect for thriving families." we remain committed to delivering trauma-informed, equitable services that support survivors in achieving long-term safety and stability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 84% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.8%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 92.4%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $1,883.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.8% of revenue deployed · 92.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $937K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.