Family Crisis Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
480935059
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Great Bend, KS, USA
Phone
6207939941
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,657,667
Expenses
$1,507,152
Assets
$1,103,463
Liabilities
$4,405

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MELINDA HARTER (PRESIDENT)
  • KYLEE GRAVES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KYLEE GRAVES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $75,000 total reported compensation
  • SHANNON SOMERS (FINANCIAL DIRECTOR): $29,595 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide advocacy and support to all surviors and secondary victims of domestic and sexual violence, child abuse and neglect while encouraging social change through awareness, education and prevention.

What it reported doing in 2024

The philosophy of the family crisis center, inc. Recognizes domestic and sexual violence are crimes and are the responsibility of the perpetrators. We believe that domestic and sexual violence are the product of sexism, racism, classism, heterosexism, and gender-based power imbalances condoned and perpetuated in our society. We further believe that all persons have the right to feel and be safe in their homes and their communities. It is the purpose of this agency to empower victims/survivors by ensuring availability of resources, accurate information, and emotional support.the domestic and sexual violence center creates a safe environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault to understand the resources and options available to them and get support as they begin to heal from the trauma. These services are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Services for the dsvc are provided in barton, barber, comanche, edwards, kiowa, ness, pawnee, pratt, rush & stafford counties. Below is a list of services: sexual violence-24-hour crisis line-face-to-face crisis services-personal advocacy-medical advocacy-law enforcement advocacy-court advocacy-shelter-supportive counseling-support group-children and youth service-community awareness-professional trainingdomestic violence-24-hour crisis line-face-to-face crisis services-personal advocacy-medical advocacy-law enforcement advocacy-court advocacy-shelter-supportive counseling-support group-children and youth service-community awareness-professional trainingthe child advocacy center (cac), creates a safe, family friendly environment for children and families. The cac becomes involved with the children and families upon referral from department for children and families (dcf) and/or law enforcement in order to assist with the investigative process and provide services through referrals as well as advocacy to the child and family. We provide forensic interviews, family advocacy, case tracking and reviews, referral services and community education to fight child abuse and neglect. It is a neutral, child and family friendly place where children can share the details of their abuse experience with trained, caring professionals through a forensic interview. This interview is recorded and used as evidence in the case against the perpetrator.a multidisciplinary team (mdt) of professionals involved in the case (dcf, law enforcement, mental health, county attorney, medical professionals, and the cac) meet monthly to determine the status of the case and monitor the progress until the case is done.during july 2024 through june 2025, an approximate 975 victims were assisted in the services of domestic violence. Through cac, 399 individuals were served and 117 forensic interviews were provided, and 65 mdt meetings were led. 1,097 bednights were provided at shelter, we answered 1,704 hotline calls, gave body safety and healthy relationship lessons to 4,199 children, and taught parenting classes to 53 adults. In addition, dsvc served 361 clients, outreached and shared services with 12,587 individuals, provided 17,903 services to clients, served 975 individuals experiencing abuse, and sara's blessings helped 142 individuals with free hygiene products, clothing, and household goods.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.7%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $109.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.7% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.