Family Career & Community Leaders of Ame Montana Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463232552
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Bozeman, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4062292017
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $297,872
- Expenses
- $246,354
- Assets
- $349,075
- Liabilities
- $83,394
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SANDY WOLDSTAD (PRESIDENT)
- CATHE FELZ (PAST-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TRACEY EATHERTON (DIRECTOR): $34,484 total reported compensation
- NICOLE WANAGO (BOARD MEMBER): $1,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to promote personal growth and leadership development through family and consumer sciences education focusing on the multiple roles of family member, wage earner, and community leader. Members develop skills for life through character development, creative and critical thinking, interpersonal communications, and practical knowledge.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our fccla state leadership conference and prostart competition is held annually. Attendance at this event has grown consistently over the past four years, with 2025 attendance at 611 for student members, advisers, and chaperones. We offer workshops for students to provide a link with exploration of and preparation for future careers, with 23 exhibitors in our college and career readiness fair, and 54 workshops offered over the day-and-a-half agenda, with 53% of the sessions focused on career development. Competitive events offer our youth an opportunity to plan and implement projects in over 40 different competitions, including the prostart management and culinary arts events, a variety of skill demonstration events including impromptu speaking, teach or train, and fashion design, and our star events, ranging from job interview to advocacy. State-level winners in our competitive events are eligible to advance to national-level competition. Over 100 members advanced to the national-level of competition in 2025, with over one-third of our competitors earning a gold rating in their events.our state leadership conference is where we see many of our annual projects conclude with recognition for our members and chapters. Chapters are encouraged to implement local outreach projects and are recognized for their efforts with state level awards as well as service swag bags, full of fun items to keep members engaged while at the conference. We also recognize our outgoing state executive council for their leadership and contributions throughout the year, as well as install our incoming council. Chapter advisers are also recognized with awards, as well as our ultimate leaders in both fccla and prostart, and we recognize scholarship recipients for both groups at the conference.local outreach projects are one of Montana fccla's foundational elements. Each year, our state officers select one area of focus for the state outreach project. For 2025 that was a program called families first. We offered the families first fccla curriculum to chapters, chapter mini-grants for chapters to develop and implement their own local projects, and we offered adviser training in the curriculum and project development. Similarly, we partnered with youth service america to offer week of service grants to chapters, and with the Montana department of transportation to offer grants and awards for youth-led traffic safety projects. The cumulative efforts resulted in over half of our chapters participating, reporting over 18,858 hours of local volunteer service through these projects as well as additional fccla community outreach.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.5%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.3%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.5% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $190K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $34K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.