Family Career and Community Leaders of America Texas Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
741384857
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
5123060099
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development - Agricultural

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,191,533
Expenses
$955,485
Assets
$4,287,923
Liabilities
$25,275

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAT GRAY (PAST STATE PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH HALFMANN (PAST STATE PRESIDENT)
  • JOHNNA PHILLIPS (STATE PRESIDENT ADVISOR)
  • HANNAH E ROSE (STATE PRESIDENT)
  • SANDRA ROSE (PARENT - STATE PRESIDENT)
  • JARED CAPPERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JARED CAPPERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $74,344 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promotes personal growth and leadership development to students that are enrolled in family and consumer science education. This is the only in-school organization with the family as its central focus and all activities focus on teaching students to be good family members, wage earners, and community leaders.

What it reported doing in 2020

The organization supports its membership by providing education resources and programs that promote the content in the family and consumer sciences curriculum. This organization sponsors regional, state and national conferences for members; leadership development conferences and training seminars for the members. All these activities provide educational opportunities and competitive events for the members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.49; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $814K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.