Family Care Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820428306
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Idaho Falls, ID, USA
Phone
2085298832
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Mental Health Center
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,335,320
Expenses
$1,361,765
Assets
$958,842
Liabilities
$261,089

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN OAKLEY (EXECUTIVE DI): $51,756 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A faith-based organization, unaffiliated with any church. Incorporated in Idaho as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization offering counseling and focused medical services as well as community outreach, rehabiliation, crisis intervention, education, and psychological evaluations. Our mission is to reach children, adolescents, and adults who are at risk because of various difficulties and problems. Our long-term goal is to reduce the impact of these problems on their lives. Oversight of the family care center is entrusted to a voluntary board of directors made up of local citizens. The organization consists of four distinct entities that carry out the mission and goals.

What it reported doing in 2014

Ruth house - traditional housing for women, faith-based temporary housing facility dedicated to providing a healthy environment where material and social resources can be administered to the homeless. The residents can then begin to root themselves while discovering their indentity in the world they live in and become productive citizens in the community-at- large.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.5%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 33.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.5% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $52K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.