Family Action Network Movement Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 650334201
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3057568050
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,303,758
- Expenses
- $2,458,469
- Assets
- $3,680,653
- Liabilities
- $302,145
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ALINE B FRANCOIS (EXECUTIVE DI): $118,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Family action network movement, inc. D.b.a. Fanm (the "organization") is a non-profit organization incorporated december 24, 1991 in the state of Florida. The organization's mission is to empower low- to moderate-income families by providing the social, financial, and political tools they need to achieve self-sufficiency and create lasting positive change in their communities. A culturally rooted organization based in miami's little haiti, the organization serves the community through programs in three areas economic empowerment, advocacy and community voice, and health and family well being. These include immigration legal assistance, mental and behavioral health counseling, after-school youth development, workforce development and financial literacy, civic engagement and advocacy, and family stabilization services. The organization serves approximately 3,000 to 5,000 individuals annually. The organization recently completed a five- year strategic planning process to position it to ad
What it reported doing in 2025
It was a challenging, yet, amazing and rewarding year. Fanm continues to provide quality services using best practices to 10,000 members in mental health, health access, immigration and citizenship, after school program, community economic development. Fanm provides wrap-around services to over 10,000 low to moderate income families in mental health, domestic violence intervention, adult education and financial literacy, access to health care, immigration services and advocacy, after school and youth leadership program, community economic development.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.3%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.6%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.3% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $118K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.