Families of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Dba Cure Sma
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363320440
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Schaumburg, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8477096318
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,213,970
- Expenses
- $14,019,399
- Assets
- $10,645,251
- Liabilities
- $3,222,762
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
36 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENNETH HOBBY (PRESIDENT)
- JESSE AYNES (VICE PRESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT)
- MARY CURRY (VICE PRESIDENT, CLINICAL RESEARCH & CARE)
- MAYNARD FRIESZ (VICE PRESIDENT, POLICY)
- JACKIE GLASCOCK (VICE PRESIDENT OF RESEARCH)
- COLLEEN MCCARTHY O'TOOLE (SR VICE PRESIDENT, COMMUNI)
Highest reported compensation
- KENNETH HOBBY (PRESIDENT): $348,806 total reported compensation
- JAMIE GIBSON (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $294,579 total reported compensation
- MARLINE PAGAN (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $239,457 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to drive research for treatments and a cure for sma, and to support and empower everyone impacted by sma today.
What it reported doing in 2024
Cure sma focuses on three different yet equally critical and interdependent research areas: basic research, to understand the cause and biology of sma; drug discovery, to convert basic research ideas into practical new drug candidates; and clinical & regulatory research, to provide the infrastructure to test the drug candidates. During this period cure sma funded six new and six ongoing basic research grants. We also funded and executed multiple clinical and regulatory focused projects, to increase sma clinical trial site capacity and readiness, to provide regulatory authorities with data on the sma population and their reported unmet needs, and to collect data to understand the patient experience with sma. Currently, there are three approved drugs for sma, with another several dozen drug programs in development, including five in clinical trials. Currently, two investigational drugs are awaiting fda approval.cure sma have three primary databases for data collection: a patient-reported database with data from over 11,000 impacted individuals worldwide that also incorporates longitudinal data from our annual community update survey; the sma clinical data registry (cdr) that contains electronic medical record (emr) sourced data from u.s. Based sma care center network sites; and the newborn screening registry with data from parents of babies with sma that were identified through statewide sma newborn screening. The above data sources are combined and analyzed annually to identify trends in demographics, diagnosis, sma treatments, unmet needs, patient care and outcomes. The most recent analyzes were published in the state of sma 2024 report available on our website. Data collected is also shared in peer-reviewed literature. Cure sma published "sma community priorities for future drug therapies: cross-sectional survey finding representing 410 adults with sma" in neurology and therapy in june 2025. In addition, cure sma supports the sma industry collaboration. Established in 2016, the collaboration is a multi-faceted partnership that brings together pharmaceutical companies, cure sma, and other nonprofit organizations to share information, ideas, and data. The sma industry collaboration works together to address scientific, clinical, and regulatory topics that are critical to advancing drug development in sma and will benefit the broader sma community. Cure sma co-created a new healthcare provider enduring continuing medical education program in addition to the in-person cure sma clinical care session offered in june 2025. Resources were also devoted to maintaining website listings of sma newborn screening referral centers and treatment centers that provide fda-approved sma treatments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.8%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.8% of revenue deployed · 77.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $349K · 36 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 42 of 43 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.