Families Helping Families of Greater New Orleans

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
721198440
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New Orleans, LA, USA
Phone
5048889111
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$776,975
Expenses
$781,640
Assets
$1,247,310
Liabilities
$38,373

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DALE LIUZZA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • LAURA NATA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DALE LIUZZA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $44,275 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organizations mission is to empower individuals with disabilities and their families to have high expectations for themselves or their loved ones with a disability through effective advocacy.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organizations single program is to provide informational support and educational services to area families who have family members with special needs (disabilities) through a coordinated network of resources, support and services. The organizations mission is to empower individuals with disabilities and their families to have high expectations for themselves or their loved ones with a disability through effective advocacy. Individuals with disabilities core expectations should be an inclusive education, independent living, and employment. The organization accomplishes this through three primary services: 1) peer-to-peer support is recognized as an effective evidence-based practice that strengthens a network people belong to and depend on for human service needs. The organization offers this support through their trained, knowledgeable staff with the same or similar lived experiences. 2) training is an important key for individuals to gain the knowledge they need to become effective advocates. Teaching individuals about the laws that govern the services they are entitled to is critical to successful advocacy. The organization uses malcolm knowles theory on adult learning as the foundation for all training development. Using knowles assumptions about adult learners motivates individuals with disabilities and their loved ones to engage in advocacy opportunities. 3) the organization provides information and outreach to individuals with disabilities and their families who often feel isolated because they are unaware of others that are experiencing the same thing. This is provided at in-person events, through literature provided to community agencies, medical staff, and others providing needed services to this population, website, social media, e-blast, and more. The organization provided 5,344 incidents of peer support to individuals and conducted 120 training webinars during the year. The organization participated in 224 outreach events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 60% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.3%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 71.3%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $239.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.6; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.3% of revenue deployed · 71.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $558K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $44K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and related organizations
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.