Families for Disability Rights Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934862917
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Irvington, NY, USA
Phone
9177501051
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Disabled Persons' Rights

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,743
Expenses
$12,032
Assets
$8,711
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACQUELINE CEONZO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAMES KARPE (OFFICER)
  • JACQUELINE CEONZO (PRESIDENT)
  • STACEY CAGAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary mission of families for disability rights inc ("fdr") is to enrich the lives of individuals with disabilities, their families, and their caregivers and to increase awareness regarding circumstances affecting individual with disabilities, their families and their caregivers.

What it reported doing in 2024

Families for disability rights has helped educate families about their rights within the self - directed system in ny state. We have helped build a coalition of families with a wide range of disabilities navigate the self direction system by educating them on the best practices using self direction through our town halls, in person meetings, website and social media. Our members are learning how they can fully participate in their communities, including take part in community classes and activities of their choice. The organization was founded by families caring for their disabled loved ones and has grown from a small core group to over 500 members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.