Fallbrook Football Boosters Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204709372
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Fallbrook, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7607236300
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $64,312
- Expenses
- $38,818
- Assets
- $77,009
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NATALIE PEET (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHAELENE WOOTEN (RECORDING SE)
- LACEY FARISH (VICE PRESIDE)
- SHASTA CERULLI (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fallbrook football boosters, inc. Is an all-volunteer parent organization that is committed to supporting coaches, athletes, and the football program ina positive way, both on and off the field. The purpose of the football boosters is to promote, encouage, and support fallbrook high school football financially and in spirit. Our goal is to strengthen the relationship between the parents, administration, faculty, coaches, football players, and the surrounding community. We want to foster and support a spirit of community among the members.
What it reported doing in 2023
The booster club funds a majority of the fallbrook hs football program for the freshmen, jv, and varsity teams including uniforms, safety gear, coaches gear, awards banquets, and team meals. It also operates the concession stand for all football games and holds various fundraising events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.6%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 95.5%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.6%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.98; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.6% of revenue deployed · 95.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.