Falcon Elite Volleyball Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472325227
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Woodinville, WA, USA
- Phone
- 4252466064
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $475,604
- Expenses
- $448,559
- Assets
- $194,721
- Liabilities
- $194,721
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIM HARMAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SANDY RHINEHART (BOARD MEMBER)
- LINDA NELSON (Member at Largw)
- CARMEN ROBERTS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Community sporting organization
What it reported doing in 2025
Ran 6 fully-rostered U12, U13, U14, U15, and U16 teams in Spring 2025 and starting 7 fully-rostered club teams from U12, U13, U14, U15, U16, and U17 in November 2025 for a 6 month club season that includes practices, tourney schedule, travel weekends, coaching staff, equipment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.1%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 40.4%; rating input score 40
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 37.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 37.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.1% of revenue deployed · 40.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $414K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $38K reported
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.