Faith Mountain Christian Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232822830
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hallstead, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5709301431
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $576,775
- Expenses
- $562,493
- Assets
- $547,344
- Liabilities
- $281,586
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY GERRITY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT ORD (BOARD MEMBER/SCHOOL ADMIN): $50,500 total reported compensation
- JESIKA LYN RANSOM (TREASURER/BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR): $40,500 total reported compensation
- REBECCA WATKINS (SECRETARY/TEACHER): $27,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Faith Mountain Christian Academy desires to provide a cost-effective learning environment that stresses academic excellence while embodying Biblical principles. This is achieved through reduced tuition, free academic support and mentoring.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our focus on our volunteer efforts have continued to provide extra support for our students in reading, math, art & other subjects. We have experienced growth in programs that add additional opportunities for our students in life skills activities and other real life application areas. Partnering with other local nonprofit organizations have also given us the ability to see our students receive meaningful internships & mentoring outside of our team. Some of these opportunities have lead to job possibilities & a greater number students seeking higher learning after graduation. These opportunities hinge on our ability to have & mantain a facility that can encourage our students. It has also meant adding staff to our team & increasing payroll over the past year, purchasing a new building to accommodate the increase in students, physical education materials, learning & teaching tools which have all been
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 87.4%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $30.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 87.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $492K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $50K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.