Faith Mission Home
Legal name: Faith Mission Home Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 590797087
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Free Union, VA, United States
- Phone
- 434-985-2294
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Residential Care & Adult Day Programs
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,678,361
- Expenses
- $1,646,301
- Assets
- $3,481,702
- Liabilities
- $195,872
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HOSEA TROYER (PRESIDENT)
- KEITH MILLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JONATHAN MARTIN (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $37,422 total reported compensation
- HOSEA TROYER (PRESIDENT): $26,585 total reported compensation
- KEITH MILLER (VICE PRESIDENT): $25,550 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Faith Mission Home supports students with intellectual disabilities, restoring hope and helping them find purpose in life through a residential, family-style setting and an educational program, with spiritual formation described as part of daily life. Volunteer at FMH Would you like to know more about our volunteer opportunities or discover how you could support Faith Mission Home? Contact Us. Active family support Reach out to FMH Deciding to enroll your child in our program can feel weighty. We understand that the decision won’t happen overnight. Talk to supportive family members or safe mentors about the idea. In the meantime, call us at 434.985.2294 for more information. Faith Mission Home is definitely a growing environment. I experienced Jesus in significant ways through the work and the people around me. I am a richer person today because of my time at Faith Mission Home. -...
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025 faith mission home continued its mission to be a channel of god's love by caring for intellectually challenged individuals who cannot care for their own needs, to walk beside them and help them find purpose and joy from day to day within the context of their limitations. Fifty-eight students were cared for by ninety-seven staff members. The care ranged from assisting them with their most basic needs such as personal hygiene and proper nutrition, to coaching them in developing life skills as they contribute to work opportunities around the village.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.2%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $37K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.