Faith Community Nurse Network of the Greater Twin Cities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202562054
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Shoreview, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6517664472
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $272,620
- Expenses
- $281,883
- Assets
- $392,142
- Liabilities
- $106
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- CAROLYN ORTTEL (BOARD MEMBER): $11,149 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of faith community nurse network of the greater twin cities is to work in partnership with others to bring faith community nursing to every congregation in the twin cities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Whole-person wellness screenings: wellness planning provides a person centered approach giving individuals the opportunity to take charge of their own health in a safe environment. During the wellness screening the individuals are able to learn body metrics, vitals, receive a cognitive screening and a depression screening, in addition to determining which dimensions of wellness, such as emotional or intellectual, they would like to make their personal focus areas. They develop wellness goals, identify barriers, and are provided with resources to help them overcome their barriers. Through data analysis and care coordination following the events, we are able to identify programs needed within specific communities, where more leaders should be developed, and most importantly enroll older adults in the programs they need to improve their quality of life. Each of our evidence-based programs has been shown to improve health outcomes and reduce risk for injury, illness, or disability among adults aged 60+. For individuals experiencing depression symptoms we were able to offer them one-on-one coaching for 5-6 months through a program called pearls or program to encourage active rewarding lives. In 2025 we reformatted our whole-person wellness screening to center around brain health after eeceiving funding from the Minnesota board on aging for dementia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.9%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $201.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.9% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $220K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $11K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.