Fairview Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.

24 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

See statement 1

Administrative expenses on behalf of tax-exempt affiliates to support their activities.

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: -423.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.48; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.54; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24.4M in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $218K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed
Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.