Fairview Endowment Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320165321
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Vallonia, IN, USA
Phone
8125281349
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Cemeteries

Reported finances

Revenue
$40,426
Expenses
$26,410
Assets
$387,170
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LUKE NOLTING (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAMES PHILLIPS (MEMBER)
  • BRIAN SOMMERS (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
  • CONNER BARNETTE (MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fairview endowment fund was organized for the purpose of providing a perpetual endowment fund for the brownstown fairview cemetery, and any other cemetery which may be owned in the future by the town of brownstown, Indiana.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization is operated exclusively for the benefit of the cemetery of the town of brownstown, Indiana. Endowment earnings are used for the perpetual care of the cemetery, such as road maintenance, landscaping, structure maintenance, and marker maintenance. In 2025, the organization paid $7,000 to james phillips to maintain and enter new information on the brownstown fairview cemetery website, including grave sites, obituaries and headstone pictures, and paid $5,000 to brian sommers for additional contract work. These expenditures are included in reportable compensation paid to directors in part iv.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34.7%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.66; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.