Fairfield Suisun Bobby Sox
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 710981064
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Fairfield, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7078160299
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fairs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,767
- Expenses
- $115,178
- Assets
- $17,651
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CLARISSA CHALLBURG (President)
- MARTHA CLARK (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- CLARISSA CHALLBURG (President)
- MARTHA CLARK (Vice President)
- CASANDRA BARRY (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of fairfield suisun bobby sox league organization is to give all girls, regardless of their playing ability, the opportunity to have fun participating in bobby sox softball program. Each year, the league shall provide an ongoing, life enriching program for the girls under the direction of bobby sox softball as established by the bobby sox constitution and official bobby sox administrative and playing rules. This irrevocable bobby sox softball dedication is for the physical, mental, and social education, development, training, and well-being of all the girls and their adult volunteers.
What it reported doing in 2017
Approximately 45 scholarships are presented to the girls of Bobby Sox each year. The exact number and award is determined during the current Spring Season. In 2001, there were 44 recipients with the total awards in excess of $17,000. Scholarship awards ranged from $100 to $2500. Qualifying 8th Graders receive a $100 Savings Bond.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.